| |
Table of Contents Introduction
Background
A
Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: 2004 - 09
Campus
Climate and Intergroup Relations
Representation
(Access and Success)
Education
and Scholarship
Institutional
Viability
and Vitality
Conclusion
Appendix
1
Appendix
2
Notes
Framework
Main Page
Archive
A
Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State:
1998 - 03
Printable Version
A
Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State:
2004 - 09 (PDF 2,606 KB)
Adobe
Acrobat Reader |
 |
Notes
1 Statement by Penn State President Graham B. Spanier,
(June 23, 2003). Available: http://live.psu.edu/index.php?sec=vs&story=3349.
2 “Joint Statement by National Higher Education Leaders
on Today’s Decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Gratz
v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger,” (June 23, 2003).
Available: http://www.acenet.edu.
3 Data provided by the University Budget Office and the Penn
State Fact Book http://www.budget.psu.edu/factbook/.
4 Data provided by the Office of the Vice Provost for Undergraduate
Education and International Programs.
5 Data provided by the Office for Disability Services.
6 Center for Adult Learner Services, November 2002, based
on enrollment information supplied by the University Budget
Office, analysis of number of undergraduate students who are
24 years of age or older and who are enrolled as resident
instruction or continuing education students.
7 Commission for Women, unpublished survey of Penn State tenured
faculty, conducted fall 2002.
8 C. Russell, Racial and Ethnic Diversity (Ithaca, NY: New
Strategist Publications, 1998).
9 Daryl Smith’s meta-analysis of research on diversity
in higher education and the impact of campus diversity initiatives
on college students suggests four interdependent dimensions
of campus diversity. See Caryn MacTighe Musil, Mildred García,
Cynthia A. Hudgins, Michael T. Nettles, William E. Sedlacek
and Daryl G. Smith, To Form a More Perfect Union: Campus Diversity
Initiatives (Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges
and Universities, 1999); Daryl G. Smith, “Strategic
Evaluation: An Imperative for the Future of Campus Diversity,”
in, Diversity and Unity: The Role of Higher Education in Building
Democracy, 2nd Tri-nation Campus Diversity Seminar ed. M.
Cross, N. Cloete, E. Beckham, A. Harper, J. Indiresan and
C. Musil, (Capetown: Maskew Miller Longman, 1999), 155-176;
Daryl G. Smith, Guy L. Gerbrick, Mark A. Figueroa, Gail Harris
Watkins, Thomas Levitan, Leeshawn Cradoc Moore, Pamela A.
Merchant, Haim Dov Beliak, and Benjamin Figueroa, Diversity
Works: The Emerging Picture of How Students Benefit (Washington,
D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 1997).
10 Ernest Boyer, Campus Life: In Search of Community (Princeton,
N.J.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching,
1990); AAC&U The Drama of Diversity and Democracy (Washington,
D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 1995).
11 Daryl G. Smith; Guy L. Gerbrick, Mark A. Figueroa, Gail
Harris Watkins, Thomas Levitan, Leeshawn Cradoc Moore, Pamela
A. Merchant, Haim Dov Beliak, and Benjamin Figueroa, Diversity
Works: The Emerging Picture of How Students Benefit (Washington,
D.C.: Association of American Colleges and Universities, 1997).
12 Daryl G. Smith and Natalie B. Schonfeld, “The Benefits
of Diversity: What the Research Tells Us,” About Campus
(November/December 2000): 16-23.
13 A Framework to Foster Diversity at Penn State: 1998-2003,
page 8.
14 Assessments included surveys, focus groups, interviews,
online discussion groups via ANGEL, etc.
15 Data to support points made in this paragraph regarding
the enrollment of Penn State students and the graduation disparities
between undergraduate students of color and white students
were obtained from the Penn State Fact Book (www.budget.psu.edu/factbook/). The NCAA Web site (www.ncaa.org/grad_rates/2002/d1/index.html) was the source for data
on the graduation rates of undergraduate African American
students at Penn State and at peer institutions. Some specific
points of these data include: Penn State enrollment of students
of color among all students at all locations was 5,711 or
7.6 percent in fall 1992 compared to 9,352 or 11.3 percent
in fall 2002; the Penn State four-class average graduation
rate after six years was 65 percent for African American undergraduate
students (University Park) which, among prominent benchmark
institutions (Cal Berkeley, Michigan, North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, Texas at Austin, and Virginia), was only exceeded by
Virginia.
16 Data provided by the University Budget Office.
17 John Brooks Slaughter, “Diversity: An Opportunity
for Excellence and Equity—The Essential Role of Faculty
Diversity,” Diversity Forum 2003 Lessons Learned: What
Works and What Hurts, Conference Report Draft, Committee on
Institutional Cooperation, July 2003. p. 23.
18 John Brooks Slaughter, “Diversity: An Opportunity
for Excellence and Equity—The Essential Role of Faculty
Diversity,” Diversity Forum 2003 Lessons Learned: What
Works and What Hurts, Conference Report Draft, Committee on
Institutional Cooperation, July 2003. p. 18.
TOP |